This issue aims to analyze, explain, and critique instances of argumentation connected to the campaign, election, and presidency of Donald Trump, as well as associated issues such as the concept of “post-truth” emerging from the Brexit campaigns. We believe that argumentation theory can help in forming answers to some of the questions that events around the new U.S. president open-up.
Submitted papers must present original research that has not been published and is not currently under review with any other journal. All submissions will be double-blind peer reviewed and selected based on the paper’s originality, significance, relevance, and clarity of presentation. The deadline for the submissions is the 1st of September, 2017.
Author Guidelines:
Submissions should be between 5000 and 7000 words (without notes) in length and follow the Informal Logic formatting template available at:
http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/about/submissions
Submissions should be prepared for blind review and sent as a PDF or Word document to:
ilsubmission2017@gmail.com
Deadlines (these are cut-off deadlines; extensions are not possible):
Paper submission deadline: September 1st, 2017
Accept or decline decisions announced: December 1st , 2017
Revised papers due: February 1st , 2018
Publication: Informal Logic, 28.1, March, 2018
Guest Editors:
Katharina Stevens PhD, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Lethbridge
Michael D. Baumtrog PhD, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Windsor
No comments:
Post a Comment