Rhetoric CFPs & TOCs

Rhetoric CFPs & TOCs
Photo: Kristoffer Trolle (creative commons)

Friday, September 30, 2016

TOC of Image[&]Narrative 17:4

TOC of Image[&]Narrative 17:4. All of the articles are available freely on the website of image[&]narrative: www.imageandnarrative.be. You can click on the links below to go directly to the articles.



Table of Contents

Thematic Cluster

Erin La Cour, Rik Spanjers
Simon Grennan
Jean-Paul Gabilliet
Joseph Witek
Barbara Uhlig
Rik Spanjers
Erin La Cour

Various Articles

Inge van de Ven
Ginette Verstraete

Review Articles

Lars Bernaerts
Léa Buisson

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Reflections on Contract Grading

From TETYC


[...]


Journal Special Issue - Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums


deadline for submissions:
January 20, 2017
full name / name of organization:
Australasian Journal of Popular Culture
contact email:
rachel.franks@sl.nsw.gov.au
Cultural institutions are custodians of important collections of the material and natural world. They are repositories of material culture that reflect the cultures and practices of humanity and the natural world, revealing the fantastic, the foibles and the strange, in addition to the efforts and products of great ingenuity. Such collections, in various formats from the ephemeral to the digital, from the bespoke to the mass produced, are accessed by many different publics, including those seeking to understand or connect with elements of popular culture. In responding to aspects of popular culture, collecting institutions such as galleries, libraries, archives and museums, bring exposure to objects and archives that provoke and stimulate the publics who engage with them. Curiosity is at the centre of this engagement with material culture as prompt. In creating a sphere in which the public can engage with their collections, cultural institutions develop experiences such as exhibitions, public programs, and those of a digital nature. These contexts provide a rich area of knowledge in which to inform new understandings of popular culture. Digital technologies and social media have deeply influenced popular culture and have contributed to reinventing much of public and private life. Collecting institutions, as repositories of this change, are positioned well to encourage scholarly research into this rich field of popular human endeavour.

This Special Issue will focus on popular culture within Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums (GLAM) within Australia and beyond. Particular emphasis will be given to the academically rigorous exposure of collections within critical cultural institutions. Focusing on unique collections and their contexts the scholarship being undertaken will be highlighted while simultaneously inviting additional research into these unique resources and contexts.

We invite researchers to offer academically rigorous pieces exploring collections as diverse as fiction and food, death studies and design, performance and photography, fashion and furniture, manuscripts, rare books, realia, special collections and more. In addition to works on cultural collections, proposals considering research in education, exhibitions, public programming, collecting practices, Indigenous protocols, and digital contexts are also encouraged. Articles representing collaborative, multidisciplinary efforts are welcome as are those encouraging further research. The editors also seek relevant reviews of exhibitions and published works for this Special Issue.



Proposals Due: 20 January 2017

Name, Affiliation, Abstract (200 words), Biographical Note (100 words), Keywords (up to 5)



Acceptances Issued: 3 February 2017



Final Papers Required: 1 June 2017

Articles should be between 4,000 - 6,000 words and must conform to the Intellect Style Guide: http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/style%20guide(journals)-1.pdf

Ruin Porn: Essays on the Obsession with Decay (Edited Collection)


deadline for submissions:
November 1, 2016
full name / name of organization:
Siobhan Lyons, Macquarie University
contact email:
siobhan.lyons@mq.edu.au
The newly-coined term ‘ruin porn’ provokes both obsession and criticism; signalling the eventual decay to which we will all invariably succumb, contemporary ruins inspire fascination and fear, a furious denial of our collective immortality and a wary flirtation with death. Contemporary ruins such as those found in Detroit and Chernobyl attract thousands of ‘ruin tourists’ or ‘ruin photographers’, many of whom attempt to engage on a meaningful level with the existential threat that these sights arouse. The terrifying beauty that we associate with contemporary ruins appears to be a modern symptom of the post-natural, architectural sublime.

In lieu of ‘ruin porn’, which tends to focus solely on the aesthetic pleasure with which such sites are associated, Kate Brown talks of the concept of ‘rustalgia’ in her book Dispatches from Dystopia: Histories of Places Not Yet Forgotten (2014). For Brown, while some people speak of their ‘lustful’ attraction to such sites, ‘others will speak in mournful tones of what is lost, what I call rustalgia.’

Modern ruins are fascinating to us because they prompt interrogation into our place in the overarching narrative of history and utterly re-configure ordinary conceptions of time. As Tong Lam argues in his photographic work Abandoned Futures: A Journey to the Posthuman World (2013), ‘in a way, we are already post-apocalyptic’.

How might we respond to the growing interest in contemporary ruins, and how does the term ruin porn strengthen or undermine this development? What does an obsession with ruin culture suggest about contemporary society, especially with the parallel emergence of anthropocentric discourse?

This essay collection seeks to produce a dialogue on contemporary ruin, ruin porn, and urban decay. Abstracts are invited that discuss topics on, but not limited to:        

Ruins and catastrophe (environmental, economic, etc.)
Ruin photography, ruin photographers, and the aesthetics of decay
Ruins, ecocriticsm, and the anthropocene
Ruins and posthumanism
The term ‘ruin porn’ and its potential problems
Ruins, nostalgia, and solastalgia
Ruins, beauty, and the architectural sublime
Ruins and the conception of time, history, and progress
Ruins and war
Artistic and fictional depictions of decay
Abandoned cities and economic downturn
Interested authors should send abstracts of 350-500 words to siobhan.lyons@mq.edu.au by November 1, 2016. Completed papers will be due in 2017. Palgrave has expressed interest in the project.

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

New Book: "Homeless: Narratives from the Streets" - McFarland Publishing

"Homeless: Narratives from the Streets" -  McFarland Publishing

A half-century after the "War on Poverty" of Lyndon Johnson, poverty
rates remain unchanged. Scholars have advanced polarized theories about
the causes of poverty, as politicians have debated how (or if) to fund
welfare programs. Yet little research has been conducted where the poor
are provided a platform to speak on their own behalf. While it is
important to understand how economic systems affect the homeless, it is
equally important to learn about the day-to-day realities faced by those
who rely on public policies for survival. Drawing on the author's
experience working in the homeless community, this book presents some of
their stories of loss, abuse, addiction, and marginalization through
interviews, observations, and ethnographic research.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1476664579/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_E.pgxb1V5MSPM

Joshua D. Phillips is an instructor in the Department of Communication
Arts and Sciences at Pennsylvania State University, Brandywine in Media,
Pennsylvania. His focus is in rhetoric and narrative analysis. He has
written several academic essays on race, poverty, and sexual violence.
Email: jdp5595@psu.edu

What are YOU looking for in a mentor? (From Great Mentoring in Graduate School)

From Great Mentoring in Graduate School:
A QUICK START GUIDE FOR PROTÉGÉS
by Laura Gail Lunsford, PhD & Vicki L. Baker, PhD

Discourse & Communication October 2016; Vol. 10, No. 5

Discourse & Communication
October 2016; Vol. 10, No. 5
Articles
(De)constructing the sociological imagination? Media discourse, intellectuals and the challenge of public engagement
Frederick T Attenborough

Public conceptions of publicness in the wake of the Copenhagen killings
Anders Horsbøl

Do we still need an army like in the First World War? An argumentative analysis of a television debate on abolishing compulsory military service in Switzerland
Jérôme Jacquin and Marta Zampa

‘Coming up next’: The discourse of television news headlines
Martin Montgomery and Debing Feng

‘Mixing’ and ‘Bending’: The recontextualisation of discourses of sustainability in integrated reporting
Franco Zappettini and Jeffrey Unerman

Book reviews
Book review: Stella Bullo, Evaluation in Advertising Reception: A Socio-cognitive and Linguistic Perspective
YJ Doran

Book review: Antoon De Rycker and Zuraidah Mohd Don, Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives
Haoran Mao

Book review: Stig A Nohrstedt and Rune Ottosen, New Wars, New Media and New Journalism: Professional Challenges in Conflict Reporting
Alexandra García

Discourse Studies Special Issue: The epistemics of Epistemics


Discourse Studies
Special Issue: The epistemics of Epistemics
October 2016; Vol. 18, No. 5
Introduction
The epistemics of Epistemics: An introduction
Michael Lynch and Douglas Macbeth

Articles
Epistemic status and the recognizability of social actions
Oskar Lindwall, Gustav Lymer, and Jonas Ivarsson

Reverting to a hidden interactional order: Epistemics, informationism, and conversation analysis
Michael Lynch and Jean Wong

The story of ‘Oh’, Part 1: Indexing structure, animating transcript
Douglas Macbeth, Jean Wong, and Michael Lynch

The story of ‘Oh’, Part 2: Animating transcript
Douglas Macbeth and Jean Wong

Comments
Throwing the baby out with the bath water? Commentary on the criticism of the ‘Epistemic Program’
Jakob Steensig and Trine Heinemann

In support of conversation analysis’ radical agenda
Graham Button and Wes Sharrock

Book reviews
Book review: Fabienne HG Chevalier and John Moore (eds), Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction
Eric Hauser

Book review: Stanton Wortham and Angela Reyes, Discourse Analysis beyond the Speech Event
Jixian Pang

Book review: Alessandro Duranti, The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others
Trudy Milburn

Book review: James Paul Gee, Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, Virtual Worlds, and Video Games
Chris Featherman

Book review: Ulrike Tabbert, Crime and Corpus: The Linguistic Representation of Crime in the Press
Chen Wenge

Book review: Tuomo Hiippala, The Structure of Multimodal Documents: An Empirical Approach
Qichang Ye

Book review: Tahir Wood, Elements of Hermeneutic Pragmatics: Agency and Interpretation
Haicui Zheng

Book review: Camilla Vásquez, The Discourse of Online Consumer Reviews
Hongqiang Zhu

Book review: Carmen Konzett, Any Questions? Identity Construction in Academic Conference Discussions
Yves Laberge

Public Understanding of Science October 2016; Vol. 25, No. 7

Public Understanding of Science
October 2016; Vol. 25, No. 7
Invited Essay
The changing uses of accuracy in science communication
Anders Hansen

Articles
What’s science? Where’s science? Science journalism in German print media
Annika Summ and Anna-Maria Volpers

Opening up animal research and science–society relations? A thematic analysis of transparency discourses in the United Kingdom
Carmen McLeod and Pru Hobson-West

Embracing and resisting climate identities in the Australian press: Sceptics, scientists and politics
Rusi Jaspal, Brigitte Nerlich, and Kitty van Vuuren

Mapping the minds of the mediators: The cognitive frames of climate journalists from five countries
Sven Engesser and Michael Brüggemann

Fukushima effects in Germany? Changes in media coverage and public opinion on nuclear power
Dorothee Arlt and Jens Wolling

‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: An example from biodiversity conservation
Paula Castro and Carla Mouro

National income and environmental concern: Observations from 35 countries
Alex Y Lo

Science, Technology & Human Values Special Issue: Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences


Science, Technology & Human Values
Special Issue: Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences
November 2016; Vol. 41, No. 6
Introduction to Special Issue
Resisting Power, Retooling Justice: Promises of Feminist Postcolonial Technosciences
Anne Pollock and Banu Subramaniam

Articles
Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-based Bioethics
Ruha Benjamin

A World of Materialisms: Postcolonial Feminist Science Studies and the New Natural
Angela Willey

A Postapartheid Genome: Genetic Ancestry Testing and Belonging in South Africa
Laura A. Foster

Identifying Democracy: Citizenship, DNA, and Identity in Postdictatorship Argentina
Lindsay Adams Smith

Latin American Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge: Alliances and Tensions
Sandra Harding

Review Essay
Corporate Capitalism and the Growing Power of Big Data: Review Essay
Martha Poon

Teaching in a Navajo Context

From TETYC



[...]


Monday, September 26, 2016

On Teaching Diverse (Maori) Materials in the Classroom

From TETYC, continuing cleaning out my journals and sharing the best with you...


[...]


Call for Papers “Remix Rhetoric” Special Issue of the Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric



Call for Papers
“Remix Rhetoric”
Special Issue of The Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric
Abstract (Proposal) Deadline October 15, 2016
MS Deadline January 31, 2017

Defining Remix
“Remix” proliferates in twenty-first century literary, political, artistic and popular or mass media discourses. In music, contemporary creators sample an earlier generation’s, or just an earlier artist’s, recorded music and then include these snippets in a new work.  Combinations of samples are interwoven with original material in a way that simultaneously presents a wholly new work and offers interpretation of the earlier work or works. Remix in other media employs the same process, “sampling” earlier art, design, and literature.  
Remix fundamentally differs from the postmodern definition and process of pastiche. Remix does not merely imitate a dead style or original in the manner of traditional pastiche; it revitalizes it, imbuing it with new creative vitality.

The Rhetorical Function of Remix
The heart of this project is coming to a better understanding of how the rhetorical process of remix adapts original material for contemporary uses.  Remix represents a new way to answer enduring questions; we look to the language and cultural artifacts of the past to respond to the problems of the present.

The Scope of the Special Issue of The Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric
In this special issue, we seek papers using a rhetorical remix theory (and remixing as a model for cultural and creative activity) to critically analyze contemporary literary, political, artistic and popular or mass media discourses.  
We invite papers from media studies, literary studies, film, rhetorical studies, composition studies, cultural studies, by established scholars and emerging voices (including graduate students).  

Introductory Bibliography on Remix
Gunkel, David.  Of Remixology: Ethics and Aesthetics After Remix.
Horton, Lisa.  “Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes.”  In Clockwork Rhetoric.
Kuhn, Virginia.  The Rhetoric of Remix.  In Transformative Works and Cultures.
Mullin, Joan A. “Appropriation, Homage, and Pastiche: Using Artistic Tradition to Reconsider and Redefine Plagiarism.” Who Owns This Text? Plagiarism, Authorship, and Disciplinary Cultures
Navas, Eduardo.  The Routledge Companion to Remix Studies
...  Remix Theory: The Aesthetics of Sampling
… “Regenerative Knowledge.” http://remixtheory.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Navas_RegenKnow.pdf
Palmeri, Jason.  Remixing Composition: A History of Multimodal Writing Pedagogy.
Ridolfo, Jim and Dànielle Nicole DeVoss. “Composing for Recomposition.”  In Kairos.

Submission Timeline & Requirements
No Later than October 15, 2016: Please send an abstract and a brief biography with credentials and contact information to Assistant Professor Lisa Horton (lhorton @ d.umn.edu) for initial review by the editors.
No Later than December 1, 2016:  You will receive editorial guidance shaping your essay and approval to submit.  Our house style is Chicago Manual of Style, 15th edition. Use footnotes rather than endnotes.
No Later than January 31, 2017:  Submit your MS on “Remix Rhetoric”
On the first page, provide a descriptive title for the essay that would make sense to a lay audience, an abstract of 100-200 words and a list of at least five keywords that describe your essay, both for purposes of sending to reviewers and for searching.
Because we are an online publication, there is no set page limit.
Writing style should be accessible to a general audience and free of unexplained jargon. Poor writing or analysis will be given an automatic reject.
No Later than February 28, 2017:  You will receive feedback in the peer review process.  The peer review process of JCR means that pieces will either be accepted, accepted with minor revisions, or rejected -- there is no “revise and resubmit.”
No Later than March 31, 2017:  Publication.

About The Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric
http://contemporaryrhetoric.com/
The Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric promotes the idea of public intellectualism.
  • We believe that both scholarship and scholars should be made available to the public as whole, rather than simply to a small group of specialists.
  • We believe that this requires a different kind of scholarship. We believe that it is possible to combine the rigors of academic inquiry with the timeliness of journalism.
  • We believe that the walls between academia and the rest of the world must become more permeable.
  • We believe that the most important barrier that must be broken is that surrounding scholarship.
  • We believe that a lay audience can understand rhetorical theory and criticism if it is written without obfuscating jargon.
  • We believe that current journals are ill-suited to this task; we seek to fill that void.
  • We believe that by using the medium of the internet we can reach far more people far more quickly than by using the traditional print medium.
  • We believe that a more robust relationship between scholars and the mass media would benefit the quality of discourse in the public sphere.
  • We believe that a more informed public is a public better able to take part in a democratic society.
The Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric publishes sophisticated, theoretically based analyses that explore the rhetorical workings of current events. Although the main focus is on rhetorical criticism, we are also open to other methodologies. We seek to combine the rigor of rhetorical analysis with the speed of journalism to create public scholarship.
The emphasis is on current events. The purpose of this journal is to promote public intellectualism by providing scholarly analysis of current events. The essays in Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric should add to the public discussion of current events and help the general public understand more fully the theoretical underpinnings of public debates and controversies, political discourse, social movements, and media events.
Because we are interested in fostering public intellectualism, you will be required to provide contact information in the event that journalists or other public figures would like further discussion on the issue about which you have written. We hope that this will help cross-pollinate the sometimes separate worlds of the media and the academy.
Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric is both freely available as an open access journal and available in the EBSCO Communication and Mass Media Complete database.

Who should teach Oral Communication classes?

From the Communication and Theatre Arts Minnesota Business Meeting


Adopted by CTAM, 9/17/16 Whereas...
  • Oral Communication competency is essential for academic and professional success;
  • Oral Communication skills are recognized as an integral component of the Minnesota Transfer
    Curriculum Goal 1;
  • Faculty credentialed in Communication Studies/Speech Communication are best qualified to
    teach the oral communication skills and theories central to this goal area;
  • Courses taught by disciplines other than Communication Studies/Speech Communication have
    been approved by some institutions within the MN State System 
Be it Resolved:
That the Communication and Theatre Association of Minnesota supports that all courses used to satisfy the oral communication component of Goal 1 of the Minnesota Transfer Curriculum
  • Should be taught by faculty with the appropriate Communication Studies/Speech Communication credentials;
  • Should be taught within a Communication Studies/Speech Communication Department. 

Boinguage

From English Journal



Sunday, September 25, 2016

I Am Already Dead: Essays on The CW's iZombie and Vertigo's iZOMBIE

I Am Already Dead: Essays on The CW's iZombie and Vertigo's iZOMBIE [Contracted with McFarland Publishers] (UPDATE)

deadline for submissions:
September 30, 2016
full name / name of organization:
Ashley Szanter and Jessica K. Richards
contact email:
izombiecollection@gmail.com
Project Overview

Editors Szanter and Richards seek original essays for an edited collection on Rob Thomas’s television series iZombie as well as the show’s graphic novel source material, Roberson and Allred’s iZOMBIE. This particular series has begun to overhaul modern constructions of the zombie in popular culture and media. While scholarship on the television zombie is not in short supply, particularly in regards to AMC’s The Walking Dead, we believe this particular show and comic series speak to a growing trend in zombie culture whereby the zombie “passes” as human—fully assimilating into normalized society. The collection aims to explore how this new, “improved” zombie altered popular notions of the zombie monster and brought in a new group of viewers who may shy away from the blood and gore tradition of other popular zombie narratives.

Chapters in the proposed collection can focus on one or more of the following categories:

Explorations of how these two narratives construct gender—particularly in regards to femininity and masculinity. Are the rules for gender performance different for male/female zombies as opposed to male/female humans?
Analyze the use of hackneyed stereotypes, especially in the television show, as the consumption of brains often leads the zombies to exhibit deeply stereotypical, sometimes racist, behaviors.
Why does a fantastical narrative with zombies require a criminal procedural overlay? Why use this particular narrative structure to examine a pending zombie apocalypse?
Analyze how TV show creator Rob Thomas adds iZombie to his current narrative oeuvre which often examines the “secret lives” of young people (i.e. Veronica Mars, Party Down, and 90210).
How does the show grapple with Marxist ideology? The show almost always posits the central antagonist as a business or corporation. Why does the narrative’s use of vigilante justice always place the public/civil servant against the private sector?
Examinations of the place/function of romance in the show and/or comic. Relationships function as a central part of the television show in particular. How do the complications of zombie life influence or impede relationships between humans/humans, humans/zombies, zombies/zombies?
Modern monster theory as an important element of pop cultural study and relevance in an era of growing zombie imagery and narrative.
Address The CW’s iZombie or Vertigo’s iZOMBIE through a particular scholarly lens.
Explore how the narrative differences between televised media and comic/graphic novel media influence the evolution of zombies in the two iZombie universes. Why do the show and comic develop different behaviors and categories for their monsters? Why does the show deviate so far from the comic in terms of narrative and mythos?
The CW’s iZombie as the result of genre exhaustion for both the traditional zombie genre as well as the paranormal romance genre. iZombie’s network is known for attractive characters/actors and a strong inclusion of romance and sexuality. Have we taken zombies and paranormal romance as far as they can go without expanding the new ZomRomCom to include heartthrob zombies?
Address iZombie or iZOMBIE and intersectionality. Of particular interest to the editors are non-binary gender and sexuality, feminism, race, “passing,” and non-traditional/deconstructed families or relationships.

Abstract Due Dates and Further Information

Preference will be given to abstracts received before September 30, 2016. Abstracts should be no longer than 350 words and be accompanied by a current CV.

** It is important to note, due to copyright, authors are highly discouraged from using any images from the show or graphic novel. In addition, direct quotations from the show or comic should be kept a minimum because copyright prevents us from having more than ten percent of the text taken directly from a copyrighted source.

Final manuscripts of 5,000-8,000 words should be submitted in MLA style by January 1, 2017.

Contact us and send abstracts to Ashley and Jessica at izombiecollection@gmail.com and visit our CFP website at http://ashleyszanter.wix.com/izombiecollection

Friday, September 23, 2016

Review of Communication, Volume 16, Issue 4, October 2016

Review of Communication, Volume 16, Issue 4, October 2016 is now available online on Taylor & Francis Online.

Special Issue: Figures of Entanglement

This new issue contains the following articles:


Guest Editors' Introduction
Figures of entanglement: special issue introduction
Christopher N. Gamble & Joshua S. Hanan
Pages: 265-280 | DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1221992

Original Articles
Breast cancer’s rhetoricity: bodily border crisis and bridge to corporeal solidarity
Annie Hill
Pages: 281-298 | DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1207347

Rhetoric’s diverse materiality: polythetic ontology and genealogy
Nathan Stormer
Pages: 299-316 | DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1207359

Of turning and tropes
Diane Marie Keeling
Pages: 317-333 | DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1215627

Entangled exchange: verkehr and rhetorical capitalism
Matthew W. Bost
Pages: 334-351 | DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1207348

Rhetorical prehistory and the Paleolithic
Thomas Rickert
Pages: 352-373 | DOI: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1207358

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Going Up: The Elevator Speech (Adam Blood, Graduate Connections Newsletter ©2016, University of Nebraska-Lincoln)

Prof. Rick Reis
For whole post, visit https://tomprof.stanford.edu/

Folks:

The posting below gives you some key tips on giving great “elevator speeches”.  It is by Adam Blood. The article is reproduced with permission, and is from the April 5, 2016 issue of the online publication, Graduate Connections Newsletter [http://www.unl.edu/gradstudies/current/news/articles], from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and is published by the Office of Graduate Studies. ©2016 Graduate Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.  All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

Regards,



Rick Reis

reis@stanford.edu

UP NEXT: The New Flagship University



Tomorrow’s Research

----------1,554 words ----------

Going Up: The Elevator Speech


As a graduate student, talking about your research to a non-specialist can be tricky. Even more of a challenge is translating what you’ve done in graduate school to how it makes you a great fit for your next career. While you may have a general idea of what you’d talk about for two or three minutes, presenting that information well can be daunting.

As a public speaking instructor and debate coach, what stands out to me about these short speaking situations is their ability to wreak havoc on the nerves of either those who are nervous about speaking to strangers, or those who are naturally quiet and would prefer to avoid being put on the spot. The key here is that speaking well in these situations is something that can often take a lot of practice, even for those who naturally have the gift of gab. These tips will show you how to practice these kinds of speeches so that you can be ready when the situation arises.

What is the Elevator Speech?

----------------------------

DEVELOP A CRUCIAL TRANSFERABLE SKILL

"Aside from fielding questions about their jobs at cocktail parties, researchers may need to summarize their work briefly while interviewing for a position, asking for money, taking a visiting politician on a lab tour or wooing a potential collaborator at a conference."

-Roberta Kwok, Two minutes to impress

----------------------------

 The Elevator Speech is a short speech between 20-30 seconds and two minutes. It got the name “elevator speech” or “elevator pitch” because it’s the length of an elevator ride. In this short time period, the speaker is expected to quickly and effectively relay information about an organization, a product, a process, or even their own credentials as a potential employee or contact. The scenario is usually something like this: you get onto an elevator with a person who could help you or your organization. Until those elevator doors open, you have a captive audience. The trick is making every second count and effectively conveying your message.

There are a few challenges connected to this kind of speech. First, it is almost entirely an impromptu speech, meaning it’s highly unlikely that you’re going to have the advantage of preparation, notes or reference material, or visual aids. It also means you don’t know who your audience is—you may be speaking with an expert from your field or an employer who has a vague idea about your research. What complicates the impromptu nature of these speeches is that until they happen, they’re referred to completely in the hypothetical. You may not know who the audience is, what exactly the message needs to be, or what other factors are going to come into play, until the moment arises. After all, when you ride the elevator, you speak with both people you know well and relative strangers.

That said, the real challenge is how to say everything you need to say in such a short time.

TIP 1: KEEP THE SITUATION IN MIND

As odd it may seem, it helps to practice for impromptu speaking situations. Imagine a scenario where you run into a promising contact in an elevator. This could be a potential employer or a potential client. Since it’s basically an imaginary scenario, feel free to have some fun with it. You could practice how you’d introduce yourself if your childhood hero happened to get into an elevator. What matters most is that you practice speaking confidently and energetically as you communicate your message.

----------------------------

TAILOR THE SPEECH

"Engineers are curious about how the technology works, but executives are seeking a high-level conceptual picture that tells them how they will save money or... For whole post, visit https://tomprof.stanford.edu/

On the Importance of Linguistics for Teaching Writing

From English Journal
(Chongwon Park and I are working on a series of articles about the importance of linguistics for the teaching of writing.  Bits and pieces will be collected here.)

[...]
Since the 1960s, I think, the "fashionable portions" of linguistic theory important to the teaching of writing have been the sociolinguistic dimensions of the discipline.  Undervalued, today, is the cognitive agenda.

Grocery Lists as Audience Analysis Exercise

From TETYC

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Kenneth Burke on "Alembicate" (from a Burke Glossary)

From RSQ

Rhetorical Questions (podcast)

Rhetorical Questions (podcast) discusses the upcoming presidential
debates with debate coaches and argumentation scholars

Rhetorical Questions has released Episode 12: Your Winner is Democracy.
I speak with Brian Delong, Jacob Stutzman, Benjamin Warner, Katherine
Lavelle, Cate Palczewski, and Kelly Young about the upcoming
presidential debates. We discuss the civic virtues of the presidential
debates, the challenges to moderating a good quality debate, and our
hopes and fears for the upcoming debates between Hillary Clinton and
Donald Trump. The show, along with previous episodes, is available at
www.rhetoricalquestions.org.

Rhetorical Questions seeks to offer rhetorical analyses of social and
political phenomena in a form accessible to popular audiences (and
suitable for undergraduate students). It launched in April 2015. You can
follow the show on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/rhetqs) and
Twitter (@RhetQs), and you can subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. Links
are available on our website, rhetoricalquestions.org. Direct email
inquiries to rhetoricalquestions@yahoo.com.

Call for Papers The Routledge Companion to African American Theatre and Performance (CAATP


Edited by Kathy A. Perkins, Sandra L. Richards,Renee Alexander Craft, and Thomas F. DeFrantz

 CAATP will provide an overview of the field that links historical events to contemporary production.


Should Linguistics Be Required of Teachers?

From English Journal...


[...]


Rhetoric and Institutions

Rhetoric and Institutions
http://www.resrhetorica.com/index.php/RR/pages/view/calls-for-papers

No 4/2016

Issue editor Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska (molekk@uni.opole.pl)

A democratic public sphere requires its institutions to be transparent and accessible to the public, However, the interests of administrators and of citizens are not always aligned. Powerful interest groups, ideologues and bureaucracies can perpetuate dominance and mystify divisions under the guise of institutional or organizational culture. Specific rhetoric is usually mobilized to achieve such purposes. But rhetoric, or rhetorical criticism, may also be used to expose the paradoxes, abnormalities and abuses within institutional discourses.

Tracing good and bad practices of institutional discourse has always been within the scope of rhetorical scholarship. The 4/2016 issue of Res Rhetorica will be devoted to exploring historical and current trends in institutional rhetoric and offering rhetorical criticism of institutional discourses in various domains of public life.

Deadline: 31.10.2016

RSA 50th Anniversary ... 2018 Special Issue of Rhetoric Society Quarterly

In 2018, the Rhetoric Society of America will celebrate its 50th anniversary!  In conjunction with a number of celebratory initiatives, the 2018 special issue of Rhetoric Society Quarterly will feature essays that commemorate the organization’s intellectual, scholarly, and historical achievements.

For this special issue, we invite individual proposals for reflective pieces that take stock of the past while projecting future paths.  Contributors will write not only to identify and consolidate accomplishments but also to explore ruptures, points of stasis, and ongoing debates.  Inspired by Raymond Williams’ concept of “keywords,” we invite proposals for reflection on a term, concept, genre, or figure central to the discipline and our collective identity.  What those keywords are will be open to investigation; we welcome proposals for essays that identify a key word, historicize it, contextualize it, and imagine its future.  We anticipate that the issue will make a history by rereading earlier scholarship (from ny era) so as to retheorize the organization’s and rhetoric’s past and envision its future.

We aim to feature prominent voices in all the various subdisciplines brought together in RSQ:  rhetoric, writing studies, communications, media/cultural/visual studies, and others.  While we invite all scholars across rhetorical studies to propose an abstract, an editorial review team will ultimately select from the pool of proposals we receive and will solicit full-length submissions for the special issue by invitation only.

Proposals, 100 words or fewer in length, should identify a “keyword” and describe what the contribution would entail. As you prepare your proposals, please keep in mind that invited full-length submissions will run approximately 4,000 words each. We anticipate receiving a large number of proposals for this very special special issue; brief and focused full-length submissions will enable us to invite more voices into the issue's limited page allotments. We invite both contributions that take the form of conventional academic essays and proposals for work in other genres. Collaboration is welcome. The special issue will be published in the summer of 2018.

Deadline for proposal submission: February 6, 2017.

First drafts of manuscripts for the selected proposal will be due in early fall 2017; this deadline allows time for blind review, revisions, and initial copyediting for publication. Final versions will be due March 1, 2018.

Please submit proposals electronically to:

Michelle Ballif, RSQ Associate Editor for Special Issues, mballif@uga.edu .

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

On Publishing in Rhetoric and Composition

From the Great Journals Exodus, from TETYC:



CFP: The Job market (Intermezzo)

CFP: The Job market



Intermezzo, a digital longform publication - http://intermezzo.enculturation.net/ - seeks submissions that deal with the job market in rhetoric and composition.



The academic job market has largely been defined for its shortcomings in the Humanities or languages. English Studies has been the most vocal among Humanities disciplines regarding the failures of the academic job market – from the lack of opportunities for current graduates to inappropriate behaviors witnessed during interviews to the dominance of the MLA in the search process to the unrealistic expectations of many ads to the ambiguous influence of neo-liberalism shrinking tenure line positions.



Rhetoric and composition, on the other hand, lacks such narratives since the narrative associated with rhetoric and composition is that its candidates are largely successful at obtaining tenure track jobs. While rhetoric and composition graduates often do well on the market, there is a need for theorizing, anecdotal narratives, and dissenting views regarding the field’s performance or future in securing tenure line jobs. The time has come to break the field’s homogenous outlook.



Intermezzo seeks 20-80,000 word submissions that explore the job market from the perspective of rhetoric and composition. In particular, we seek submissions that problematize rhetoric and composition and the academic job market by not simply repeating the English narrative nor by offering the idealistic counter point to that narrative, but by exploring



- The future of rhetoric and composition and the job market

- The current state of rhetoric and composition and the job market

- The unique experiences of rhetoric and composition job candidates

- The relationship to rhetoric and composition searches and the expectation of writing program administration

- The utopian mythology of rhetoric and composition’s stability on the job market

- The field’s response to race and gender concerns regarding academic job searches and hiring



Or other positions.



We are particularly interested in essays from a variety of professional backgrounds: professors, administrators, lecturers, and adjuncts. We are also interested in submissions which take advantage of organizational strategies print publications might not publish – such as the inclusion of audio, imagery, and video.



All work published with Intermezzo undergoes peer review. Intermezzo is committed to providing an outlet for essays too long for journal publication, but too short for monograph publication. Essays are published as open source, are registered with the Library of Congress,  and receive ISBN numbers.  They may include multimedia as well. Intermezzo expects to publish five new works in the next year and is one of the fastest growing outlets of alterative academic work.



Intermezzo is meant to be a venue where writers can produce scholarly work in unique ways, outside of institutional or disciplinary expectation, and it takes advantage of digital media as a platform for both content and distribution of timely topics.



Intermezzo accepts longform essays on a rolling submission basis, with no deadlines.



Please submit submissions, abstracts, or queries to



Jeff Rice

Series Editor

j.rice@uky.edu

Iowa Journal of Communication -- Internet Communication Special Issue and General Issue

Iowa Journal of Communication -- Internet Communication Special Issue
and General Issue

Volume 48 of the Iowa Journal of Communication has now been published.

This volume features a special issue on Internet Communication.
Articles focus on issues of privacy, Twitterbots and interpersonal
impressions, Internet use by transgender individuals seeking social
support, fan-celebrity interactions, as well as connections among
Facebook relational maintenance, stress, and closeness

The general issue of this volume offers a range of scholarship,
encompassing such topics as listening anxiety and verbal aggression,
documentary-based reality television, problematic sibling-in-laws,
politeness and sexual debut, as well as disclosure of mental health
counseling utilization.  Also included are reviews of recent
publications in the discipline.

The complete tables of content for both issues are provided below.

Information about these and previous issues, review opportunities, and
submission details for upcoming issues can be received by contacting the
editor through the following address: mcmahan@missouriwestern.edu


Iowa Journal of Communication:  Volume 48, Number 1

Internet Communication:  Introduction to the Special Issue

- David T. McMahan

Blurred Lines: Privacy Management, Family Relationships, and Facebook


- Joshua H. Miller, Carly Danielson, Erin Sahlstein Parcell, Kristine
Nicolini, & Theresa Boucher

The Impact of Twitterbot Race on Interpersonal Impressions


- Henry Goble, Austin J. Beattie, & Chad Edwards

Socially Supported Transition: How Transgender Individuals use the
Internet to Navigate Medical Transition

- Katy A. Ross & Juliann C. Scholl

To Tweet or Not to Tweet: Explaining Fan-Celebrity Interaction on
Twitter

- Natalie Pennington, Jeffrey A. Hall, & Alex Hutchinson

"I'm too stressed to 'like' your post!": Exploring the Connections Among
Facebook Relational Maintenance, Stress, and Closeness

- Jamie E. Foster & Allison R. Thorson


Iowa Journal of Communication:  Volume 48, Number 2

Words Can Hurt the Ones You Love: Interpersonal Trust as it Relates to
Listening Anxiety and Verbal Aggression

- Natalie S. Hoskins, Alesia Woszidlo, & Adrianne Kunkel

Exploring the Appeal of Documentary-Based Programming: Discerning Viewer
Enjoyment of Reality Television through Uses and Gratifications

- Kristin M. Barton

That Woman Who Married my Brother: The Problematic Sibling-in-Law's
Influence on Adult Sibling Closeness

- Carolyn Prentice & Jill Tyler

When Politeness is Risky: Positive Politeness and Sexual Debut

- Kimberly A. Parker, Bobi Ivanov, & Elisia L. Cohen


College Students' Disclosure of Mental Health Counseling Utilization

- Hannah Butler

Beyond New Media: Discourse and Critique in a Polymediated Age (Review)

- Tony E. Adams

Feeling Mediated: A History of Media Technology and Emotion in America
(Review)

- Thomas P. Oates

A Communication Perspective on the Military: Interactions, Messages, and
Discourses (Review)

- Carol L. Tschampl-Diesing

New book, Urban Renewal and Resistance: Race, Space, and the City in the Late Twentieth to the Early Twenty-First Century

Book Announcement

Mary E. Triece, Professor in the School of Communication at The
University of Akron has a new book, Urban Renewal and Resistance: Race,
Space, and the City in the Late Twentieth to the Early Twenty-First
Century, published by Lexington Books. Urban Renewal and Resistance
explores how urban spaces such as Detroit and Harlem are rhetorically
structured through neoliberal discourses that mask the racialized nature
of housing and health in American cities. The analysis focuses on city
planning documents, web sites, and media accounts, and draws on sights
from personal interviews in order to pull together a story of city
growth and its consequences, while keeping an eye on the ways city
residents continue to confront and resist control over their communities
through counter-narratives that challenge geographies of injustice.

Seeking Manuscript Proposals for Upcoming Book on LGBT issues in Public Relations

Seeking Manuscript Proposals for Upcoming Book on LGBT issues in Public Relations

Natalie Tindall and Richard Waters, editors of Coming out of the Closet: Exploring LGBT Issues in Strategic Communication with Theory and Research, are soliciting brief proposals (title and 1,000 word synopsis) for research chapters to be included in an upcoming edited volume that focuses on public relations theory and concepts as they relate to the LGBT community, organizations, individual practitioners, and campaigns.

While there have been an increasing number of articles and chapters published on LGBT issues in public relations outlets, this audience is still largely ignored by scholarly research.  The goal of this project is to increase scholarly examination of LGBT communities, employees, volunteers, and external publics and stakeholders from a public relations perspective. This edited book will focus on a variety of topics, including (but not limited to):

Employment and workplace issues of LGBT employees

Community-building strategies with PRIDE campaigns/events

Content analyses of LGBT events’ promotional messages or even media coverage of LGBT events/spokespeople

Career experiences and workplace identity

Activism strategies (e.g., gay marriage debate, bathroom legislations, fair housing policies)

Communication strategy with crossing over from LGBT media to mainstream media

Corporate Social Responsibility and LGBT inclusion (employees, external communities)

Media relations efforts of LGBT organizations (e.g., agenda setting and agenda building)

Characteristics of LGBT PR practitioners

Content analysis of LGBT PRSA Anvil Winning campaigns

Organizational reactions to social/political efforts (e.g., advocacy, publicity–message design)

Relationship management strategies for LGBT publics

Case studies of LGBT-targeted campaigns

Inclusion of LGBT matters into public relations classrooms and pedagogy

Messaging and relationship-building strategies for different audiences within the broader LGBT community

By no means is this list exhaustive, and the editors are open to more ideas. The editors are open and want to include a variety of research methods and research perspectives for this book.

Please submit your working title and a synopsis by October 31, 2016.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the co-editors: Natalie Tindall at drnatalietjtindall@gmail.com and Richard Waters atRdwaters@usfca.edu.

Call for Papers: ASAP/Journal Special Issue Rules of Engagement: Art, Process, Protest

Call for Papers: ASAP/Journal Special Issue

Rules of Engagement:

Art, Process, Protest

Special Issue Editors: Melissa Lee, Jonathan P. Eburne, Amy J. Elias

Essay Submission Deadline: June 1, 2017



ASAP/Journal seeks essays for a special issue that examines the procedural logics and practices of protest art today. Beyond measuring the political intentions and consequences of protest art or simply describing protest art that has not yet been identified, essays should consider the processes—tactical, conceptual, material, formal—through which contemporary art encounters the political and how those processes are manifested specifically in form.

This special issue of ASAP/Journal investigates how “the political” leaves its imprint on the very project of artistic production, but also how the reverse may be true. How, in other words, does the exigency of “protest” bear upon the means through which art is made and encountered—the media, institutions, concepts, and affects through which it becomes knowable? Recent critical attention to notions of relational aesthetics, social aesthetics, and tactical media has sought better to understand how art can function politically. How, though, does the specificity of protest demand new iterations of the way artists—as well as audiences, spectators, critics, institutions, and the art market—approach the very practice of art making?  How does protest inform process?

Protest has been most commonly defined as an action or statement expressing dissent; considered more broadly, the term invokes a public form of assertion and witnessing (testari) on behalf of political transformation. One understanding of politically activist art centers on the ways in which artists deploy their practices to promote values of social reform. Another understanding holds that art, through its combination of aesthetic value and the spectacularization of politics (including political protest), can engineer new collective, insurgent, or revolutionary relations, a “redistribution of the sensible,” in the words of Jacques Rancière. Today, however, many of the older tactics of protest are easily coopted by a culture industry itself designed to operate in the realm of the aesthetic and to predetermine rules of engagement, thus seemingly uniquely able to incorporate and neutralize protest art. Protest art (as well as its critical identification and definition) always runs the risk of belatedness or naiveté—one thinks of Micah White’s post-Occupy contention that protest is now “broken”—and so while the question of art’s relation to the political has fueled critical and practical debates for over a century and a half, the discussion has become both more fraught and more urgent in the new, post-1960s millennium.

We are primarily interested in how the arts now figure in this protest debate under these conditions. Certainly, considerable work has been done concerning how artists such as Pussy Riot, Banksy, the Guerilla Girls, and Ai Weiwei have gained global recognition as major figures associated with protest movements, while the diverse forms of protest art in public uprisings such as Zuccotti Park (2011), Tahrir Square (2011), and Tamar Park (2014) have generated debates for some time now about the relation between art and activism worldwide. Critical studies and exhibitions attempt to articulate the rationale and effectiveness of such arts protest. In literary studies, recent books have identified components of protest literature, argued for its national alliances, and presented anthologized work by practicing protest writers. Museum exhibitions have turned their attention to the material culture of social protest, documenting the repurposing of vernacular objects toward explicitly activist ends, while other exhibitions offer histories of the visual culture of political movements and crises of the 20th and 21st centuries. Choreographers such as Jawole Willa Jo Zollar and Chandralekha have used dance as embodied protest politics, while Black Lives Matter and other movements have returned to music as a vehicle of protest—as in rapper J. Cole’s release of “Be Free,” a song that NPR’s Ann Powers tweeted was “the first fully-formed protest song I've heard addressing the death of Mike Brown.”

We welcome submissions that do not limit themselves to close readings or descriptions of specific artworks but that by contrast use specific arts examples to address the larger question: What are the (formal, epistemological, aesthetic, political, ethical, national, racial, gender, class) rules of engagement for protest art?

Whereas the print journal is limited to presenting articles in traditional print format, the editors will consider essay submissions in the form of visual, electronic, and musical text, images, and other forms of writing.



Essays due by June 1, 2017

Please send queries or abstracts via email to editors_asap@press.jhu.edu. Articles should be submitted to the journal’s online submission site at http://journals.psu.edu/asap/index.php/testJournal/announcement

Essay submissions of 6000-8000 words (including notes but excluding translations, which should accompany foreign-language quotations) in Microsoft Word should be prepared in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style. All content in the journal is anonymously peer reviewed by at least two referees. If the contribution includes any materials (e.g., quotations that exceed fair use, illustrations, charts, other graphics) that have been taken from another source, the author must obtain written permission to reproduce them in print and electronic formats and assume all reprinting costs. Manuscripts in languages other than English are accepted for review but must be accompanied by a detailed summary in English (generally of 1,000–1,500 words) and must be translated into English if they are recommended for publication.

Authors’ names should not appear on manuscripts; when submitting manuscripts, authors should remove identifying information by clicking on “File”/”Properties” in Microsoft Word and removing identifying tags for the piece. Authors should not refer to themselves in the first person in the submitted text or notes if such references would identify them.

For additional submission guidelines, please see: https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/asap_journal/guidelines.html