Public Understanding of Science May 2016; Vol. 25, No. 4

Public Understanding of Science
May 2016; Vol. 25, No. 4
Essay Competition
Results of the essay competition on the ‘deficit concept’
Martin W Bauer

The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
Molly J. Simis, Haley Madden, Michael A. Cacciatore, and Sara K. Yeo

In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences
Brianne Suldovsky

In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
Henry Ko

In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
Gitte Meyer

In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit
Carina Cortassa

In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
Beth G. Raps

Articles
Dynamic development of public attitudes towards science policymaking
Keisuke Okamura

Evaluating elements of trust: Race and class in risk communication in post-Katrina New Orleans
B.F. Battistoli

Experimenting with distributed approaches – Case study: A ‘national-level’ distributed dialogue on bioenergy in the United Kingdom
Marta Entradas

A failed platform: The Citizen Consensus Conference travels to Chile
Sebastián Ureta